Hotel Prices May be on the Rise, but Affordable Luxury Can be Had Hotels.com data showcases where travelers can save

Hotel LKFDALLAS, Sept. 19, 2014 /PRNewswire/ — U.S. travelers paid the most for five-star hotels in Tokyo, Rio de Janeiro and Boston in the first half of 2014, according to the most recent Hotels.com® Hotel Price Index™ (HPI®). While a stay at a five-star property in a major city may cost north of $500 per night, the HPI shows that U.S. travelers can still find luxurious values in destinations around the world.

“We’ve identified some very popular destinations where you can find five-star hotels at a fraction of the cost of other larger cities,” said Taylor L. Cole, APR, travel expert for Hotels.com. “For example, explorers can visit world-renowned sites like the amazing pyramids of Egypt, the Great Wall of China, the shops of the Grand Bazaar in Istanbul, or the famous Leaning Tower of Pisa all while enjoying plush accommodations for an affordable price.”

According to the HPI, the 10 most affordable five-star hotel destinations in the first half of 2014 were found inEurope and Asia with travelers paying an average of $210 or less per night. For the cost of a five-star stay inBoston ($538), travelers were able to stay three nights in Pisa ($172/night; $516 total) or four nights in Warsaw($130/night; $520 total) while making a luxurious five-star hotel their home.

Four of the most affordable five-star destinations also ranked among the 50 most popular international cities for Americans in the first half of the year – Istanbul (#18), Bangkok (#21), Beijing (#30) and Brussels (#50).Bangkok saw one of the biggest decreases in average five-star prices during the timeframe, dropping 16% to$186.

Best Five-Star Values for U.S. Travelers

City

Country

H1 2014

H1 2013

YoY

1. Warsaw

Poland

$130

$120

9%

2. Pisa

Italy

$172

$205

-1%

3. Cairo

Egypt

$175

$188

-7%

4. Mumbai

India

$176

$188

-7%

5. Delhi

India

$179

$189

-5%

6. Bangkok

Thailand

$186

$221

-16%

7. Budapest

Hungary

$199

$195

2%

8. Brussels

Belgium

$205

$194

6%

9. Beijing

China

$209

$220

-5%

10. Istanbul

Turkey

$210

$230

-9%

This chart reflects the actual prices paid per night by travelers from the U.S. in U.S. Dollars ($) during the first half of 2014, as compared to the first half of 2013.

Travelers can also find similar value destinations when searching for four-star properties. For the price of a one-night stay at a four-star property in London ($267) – the most popular international destination for Americans – U.S. travelers were able to stay two nights in Madrid (#14; $131), Bangkok (#21; $100), Shanghai (#25; $130),Prague (#27; $123) or Beijing (#30; $124) during the first half of the year. The HPI also shows what destinations travelers can explore at similar price points. For the average price of a four-star stay in the 8th most popular international destination for Americans – Montreal ($222) – travelers can relax on the Sentosa Island inSingapore (#19) or explore the medieval architecture and castles of Edinburgh (#40).

Although Honolulu was the 38th Most Popular Domestic City for Americans, it was also the city where U.S. travelers paid the most in the first half of 2014, with one-star hotel prices averaging $142 per night. For about the same price per night, travelers were able to get away to a four-star hotel in exotic cities such as Cape Town, South Africa ($140) or Sydney ($140).

Best Four-Star Values for U.S. Travelers

City

Country

H1 2014

H1 2013

YoY

1. Bangkok

Thailand

$100

$114

-12%

2. Warsaw

Poland

$105

$99

6%

3. Marrakech

Morocco

$106

$114

-7%

4. Delhi

India

$109

$130

-16%

5. Budapest

Hungary

$112

$111

1%

6. Mumbai

India

$112

$138

-19%

7. Jakarta

Indonesia

$117

$138

-16%

8. Cairo

Egypt

$123

$140

-12%

9. Prague

Czech Republic

$123

$127

-3%

10. Beijing

China

$124

$126

-2%

This chart reflects the actual prices paid per night by travelers from the U.S. in U.S. Dollars ($) during the first half of 2014, as compared to the first half of 2013.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× 6 = twenty four

1 × two =